Evidence in Lubbock Drug Cases

A diligent drug attorney could review the methods that law enforcement used to collect the evidence and form their accusations. In some cases, the evidence in Lubbock drug cases may not have been legally obtained. For example, if a police officer did not have probable cause to search a person, the evidence might not be admissible in court. A lawyer could file a motion to suppress such evidence. If the motion is granted, it could positively impact a person’s case. A motion to suppress evidence may also be applied in scenarios where police fail to obtain a search warrant or commit a search that extends outside the warrant. In these situations, a lawyer who is familiar with the methods of collecting evidence in Lubbock drug cases could argue against the validity of the search.

Another way an attorney could help dispute the validity of evidence regards the actual testing of the substance. For example, a lab may conduct a test on a substance inaccurately or may have contaminated the evidence submitted by the prosecution. A lawyer could request that such evidence be dismissed.

Drug possession cases often involve an undercover police officer. A skilled defense attorney could dispute the credibility of the officer, especially if the officer has a history of using questionable tactics.